WHO WERE THE FIRST BLACK BIKERS ON THE SET IN THE WEST:
I researched and found that the first all Black Motorcycle Club was actually a drill team riders out of Northern California. Many thought the Star Riders were the first black motorcycle club on the set but it was noted that a premier motorcyclists named Don Myers, aka “Snake”. Don was a member of the Berkeley Tigers back in 1953. This club predated the Star Riders. They wore colors on their backs with jazzy green and yellow sweaters with their names embroidered on the front. The Berkeley Tigers had members only in Northern California in cities like Vallejo, San Rafael and San Francisco.
By 1955 they had trouble in their camp because some members wanted to wear black and white uniforms as well as paint their bikes all black like the Star Riders. Don wasn’t cool with that so they called a meeting and they say it became violent. Don wanted to let the members have their bikes any color and design. The members who agreed with him wanted to keep their sense of individuality. They placed it before the members to vote and unfortunately for Don, aka “Snake”, he was overruled. That began the separation of the Berkeley Tigers. Don formed the California Blazers with the members who agreed with him.
One of the earliest noted Black Motorcycle Club in Northern California was the Bayview Rockets, which started in 1951. There also was the Buffalo Riders, the Space Riders, the Jolly Riders, the Peacemakers and the Safari Riders. The Richmond Roadrunners is another club that came up around this time and Richmond is a dangerous ruff city even to this day.
If you have any history to share I would love to post your knowledge. I encourage those of you who have information to share it so we all can be empowered.
Goldie-Regulator for Life!

Popularity: 1% [?]

History Of The Chopper-Sugar Bear Los Angeles CA

[youtube=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q4b8sDnYAMs]

Popularity: unranked [?]

CAN YOU HAVE A HEALTHY RELATIONSHIP IN THE BIKE COMMUNITY?

I know this will create some traction and rightfully so. I decided to jump into this for a plethora of reasons. I am a member of a coed motorcycle club. I would consider myself a busty black female biker. I tend to accentuate my assets and find nothing wrong with doing this. Well my man is a biker too. He is very laid back and we trust each other so we don’t have issues. He doesn’t let the attention bother him. However, that ain’t the case with others on the set. Most black biker chicks and black bikers tend to change mates like changing our oil on our bikes. Like every 3000 to 5000 miles. I won’t get into the relationships with non riders at this time. I will save this topic for another time.

For those of you who have someone that your want to get rid of follow these steps:

  1. Start calling your girlfriend/boyfriend by your ex’s name.
  2. Never ask how their day went. Talk about yourself all the time. Whenever possible, admire yourself in the mirror. Make sure they see this!
  3. Leave telephone numbers and notes from other men/women all over the place. They can be fake numbers, who cares.
  4. Eat lots and lots of garlic. The objective is to smell bad at the same.
  5. Drink lots and lots of beer or Petron. Staying drunk will increase the probability of losing them.
  6. Go several days without showering or getting dressed. Don’t ask them out, just let things go!
  7. Make a point to act like you’re sleep and talk about someone they hate.

Okay I want to ask for your suggestions and we can compile a great list to share with each other. I look forward to your feedback. I can wait…yummy.

Popularity: unranked [?]

Motorcyclists Injured in Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes

NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590 Traffic Safety Facts

Research Note

DOT HS 811 149 July 2009

Motorcyclists Injured in Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes

Summary of Findings

The number of people injured in motor vehicle traffic crashes, as estimated from NHTSA’s National Automotive Sampling System (NASS) General Estimate System (GES) has declined from 1999 onwards; however, estimates of motorcyclists injured in crashes have increased each year since 1998. Motorcyclists injured in crashes have increased by 110 percent from 1998 to 2007. Data for the past 10 years (1998-2007) was researched to see various trends among motorcyclists injured in motor vehicle crashes. Following is a summary of findings from this research note:

The proportion of motorcyclists injured in crashes (single-vehicle/multivehicle) has remained almost the same (about 50%).

More than two-thirds of the motorcyclists injured were in crashes during the months from April through September.

The proportion of motorcyclists injured in crashes by day of week (weekday versus weekend) has remained almost the same (55% versus 45%).

However, based on the number of hours during weekdays and weekends the injury rate was nearly 1.5 times higher during weekends than during weekdays.

Of the motorcyclists injured, more than 60 percent were in crashes that occurred during daytime.

Across all 10 years, about 90 percent of the motorcyclists injured in crashes were motorcycle riders (operators) and 10 percent were motorcycle passengers.

The proportion of motorcyclists injured in alcohol-related crashes has remained almost the same (10% in 1998 to 9% in 2007).

Nearly 85 percent of the motorcyclists injured in crashes each year are male and about 15 percent are female.

Motorcyclists injured in crashes increased among all age groups.

The largest number of motorcyclists injured in each year was in the 20-29 age group.

Introduction

Of the 2,491,000 people who were injured in motor vehicle crashes on the Nation’s highways in 2007, 103,000 (4%) were motorcyclists. Motorcyclists injured in motor vehicle crashes in the last 10 years (1998-2007), have increased by 110 percent, from 49,000 in 1998 to 103,000 in 2007. Figure 1 shows motorcyclists injured in crashes in the past 10 years. The data used is from the NHTSA’s National Automotive Sampling System 2 NHTSA’s National Center for Statistics and Analysis 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE., Washington, DC 20590

General Estimate System. NASS GES contains data from a nationally representative sample of police-reported crashes of all severities, including those that result in death, injury, or property damage. Data presented from NASS GES are estimates and are subject to sampling errors (see Appendix C of Traffic Safety Facts each year for more information on these errors). This Research Note analyzes data on motorcyclists injured in police-reported crashes (fatal crashes and injury crashes) by different characteristics. For comparison with motorcyclist fatalities in crashes, a detailed report on motorcyclist fatality trends and characteristics, titled Recent Trends in Fatal Motorcycle Crashes: An Update (DOT HS 810 606) is available at: www-nrd.nhtsa.dot.gov/Pubs/810606.PDF.Figure 1

Motorcyclists Injured in Motor Vehicle Crashes, 1998–2007

Data Analysis

The data analysis in this Research Note looks at motorcyclists injured in motor vehicle crashes over the 10-year period (1998-2007) by the type of crash (single-vehicle/multivehicle), day of week (weekday/weekend) and by other factors such as alcohol involvement, helmet use, age group, sex, and person type of the motorcyclist injured. The data in this Research Note was rounded to the nearest thousand. However, percentages were calculated before rounding, hence row totals may not add up to individual cells.

Motorcyclists Injured, by Crash Type

Of the 103,000 motorcyclists injured in crashes in 2007, 50,000 (48%) were in single-vehicle crashes and 53,000 (52%) were in multivehicle crashes. The number of motorcyclists injured in single-vehicle motorcycle crashes increased by 108 percent from 24,000 in 1998 to 50,000 in 2007. Motorcyclists injured in multivehicle crashes also increased, by 112 percent from 25,000 in 1998 to 53,000 in 2007. However, the proportion of motorcyclists injured by crash type (single-vehicle versus multivehicle) in the past 10 years has remained almost the same. Table 1 shows motorcyclists injured in crashes by crash type and year.


 

Table 1

Motorcyclists Injured in Motor Vehicle Traffic Crashes, By Crash Type and Year

Calendar Year

Crash Type

Total

Single-Vehicle

Multivehicle

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

Number

Percent

1998

24,000

49

25,000

51

49,000

100

1999

23,000

46

27,000

54

50,000

100

2000

28,000

48

30,000

52

58,000

100

2001

28,000

47

32,000

53

60,000

100

2002

33,000

51

32,000

49

65,000

100

2003

32,000

48

35,000

52

67,000

100

2004

38,000

50

38,000

50

76,000

100

2005

44,000

50

43,000

50

87,000

100

2006

43,000

49

44,000

51

88,000

100

2007

50,000

48

53,000

52

103,000

100

Source: NHTSA, NCSA, NASS GES 1998-2007

Motorcyclists Injured, by Quarter

Motorcyclists injured in crashes in 2007 when examined at a quarterly basis show that the highest number of motorcyclists injured, 37,000 (36%), were injured during July through September, followed by 33,000 (32%) from April through June, 17,000 (17%) from October through December, and 16,000 (15%) during January through March. More than two-thirds (68%) of the motorcyclists injured in crashes in 2007 were injured during the period April through September. April to September is the high riding season for motorcyclists. Motorcyclists injured in the past 10 years (1998 to 2007) during April through September ranged from 67 percent to 73 percent.

Motorcyclists Injured, by Day of Week

Among the motorcyclists injured in crashes in 2007, 57,000 (55%) were injured in crashes that occurred during weekdays and 46,000 (45%) were injured in crashes during weekends. In the past 10 years this trend has remained almost the same except for year 2002 when the proportions of motorcyclists injured in crashes during weekday and weekends were the same. NHTSA uses the following definitions for “weekday” and “weekend”:

Weekday: 6 a.m. Monday to 5:59 p.m. Friday.

Weekend: 6 p.m. Friday to 5:59 a.m. Monday.

Based on the definition above, the number of hours during a weekend is 60 (2½ days) and during weekdays is 108 (4½ days). The total number of weekend days during a year is 130 (52 weeks x 2½ days) and the total number of weekdays during a year is 234 (52 weeks x 4½ days). In 2007, there were 57,000 motorcyclists injured during weekdays, which translates to an average of 244 motorcyclists injured per day. During weekends there were 46,000 injured, which translates to an average of 354 motorcyclists injured per day. Hence, in 2007, the injury rate (per time period) was nearly 1.5 times higher during weekends than during weekdays. This might suggest more recreational motorcycle riding during weekends.

Motorcyclists Injured, by Time of Day

Nearly two-thirds (67,000) of the motorcyclists injured in 2007 were injured in crashes that occurred during daytime, and 35 percent (36,000) were injured during nighttime crashes. In all the years the number of motorcyclists injured in daytime crashes was more than 60 percent except in year 1998. Motorcyclists injured during daytime crashes in the 10 year period (1998-2007) have ranged from a low of 58 percent in 1998 to a high of 67 percent in 2002.

Motorcyclists Injured, by Age Group

Nearly one-third (32,000 or 31%) of the 103,000 motorcyclists injured in 2007 in crashes were in the 20-to-29 age group, the highest among all age groups. This was followed by 21,000 (21%) in the 40-to-49 age group, 18,000 (17%) in the 30-to-39 age group, 15,000 (15%) in the 50-to-59 age group, 9,000 (9%) in the under-20 age group and 8,000 (7%) in the above-59 age group. The number of motorcyclists injured from 1998 to 2007 increased among all age groups. Motorcyclists injured in the under-20 age group increased by 29 percent from 7,000 to 9,000, in the 20-to-29 age group from 13,000 to 32,000 (146% increase), in the 30-to-39 age group from 12,000 to 18,000 (50% increase), in the 40-to-49 age group from 9,000 to 21,000 (133% increase), in the 50-to-59 age group from 6,000 to 15,000 (150% increase) and in the above-59 age group from 2,000 to 8,000 (300% increase). The 20-to-29 and 40 and above age groups had the largest increase in motorcyclists injured in the past 10 years. Motorcyclists injured in the 20-to-29 group had the highest number in all the years.

Motorcyclists Injured, by Gender

In 2007, of the 103,000 motorcyclists injured in crashes, 89,000 (87%) were males and 14,000 (13%) were females. About 85 percent of the motorcyclists injured in crashes each year were males and about 15 percent were females. Similar trends have been noticed among motorcyclists killed in fatal crashes. In the last 10 years, of the motorcyclists injured the proportion of male to female motorcyclists injured has ranged from 90 percent males to 10 percent females in 1999, to 83 percent males and 17 percent females in 2002.

Conclusions

The findings from this research note indicate that data trends among motorcyclists injured in motor vehicle crashes are very similar to the trends seen in fatal motorcycle crashes. In the past 10 years (1998-2007), motorcyclists injured in crashes have increased at a higher rate than the increase in motorcycle registrations (110% versus 84%). There is an overall shift in the age of the motorcyclists injured in crashes with more older motorcyclists (40 and older) getting injured. Even though the 20-to-29 age group still continues to have the highest number of motorcyclists injured the other age groups are closely catching up. More motorcyclists are getting injured in crashes during weekends, indicating recreational driving.

For questions regarding the data reported in this publication, please send an e-mail to the NCSA Webmaster at ncsaweb@dot.gov.

Popularity: 1% [?]

"Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors and Identification of Countermeasures"

This document is available through: The National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22161 “Motorcycle Accident Cause Factors and Identification of Countermeasures” Findings Throughout the accident and exposure data there are special observations which relate to accident and injury causation and characteristics of the motorcycle accidents studied.

These findings are summarized as follows:

1. Approximately three-fourths of these motorcycle accidents involved collision with another vehicle, which was most usually a passenger automobile.

2. Approximately one-fourth of these motorcycle accidents were single vehicle accidents involving the motorcycle colliding with the roadway or some fixed object in the environment.

3. Vehicle failure accounted for less than 3% of these motorcycle accidents, and most of those were single vehicle accidents where control was lost due to a puncture flat.

4. In the single vehicle accidents, motorcycle rider error was present as the accident precipitating factor in about two-thirds of the cases, with the typical error being a slide out and fall due to over braking or running wide on a curve due to excess speed or under-cornering.

5. Roadway defects (pavement ridges, potholes, etc.) were the accident cause in 2% of the accidents; animal involvement was 1% of the accidents.

6. In the multiple vehicle accidents, the driver of the other vehicle violated the motorcycle right-of-way and caused the accident in two-thirds of those accidents.

7. The failure of motorists to detect and recognize motorcycles in traffic is the predominating cause of motorcycle accidents. The driver of the other vehicle involved in collision with the motorcycle did not see the motorcycle before the collision, or did not see the motorcycle until too late to avoid the collision.

8. Deliberate hostile action by a motorist against a motorcycle rider is a rare accident cause. The most frequent accident configuration is the motorcycle proceeding straight then the automobile makes a left turn in front of the oncoming motorcycle.

9. Intersections are the most likely place for the motorcycle accident, with the other vehicle violating the motorcycle right-of-way, and often violating traffic controls.

10. Weather is not a factor in 98% of motorcycle accidents.

11. Most motorcycle accidents involve a short trip associated with shopping, errands, friends, entertainment or recreation, and the accident is likely to happen in a very short time close to the trip origin.

12. The view of the motorcycle or the other vehicle involved in the accident is limited by glare or obstructed by other vehicles in almost half of the multiple vehicle accidents.

13. Conspicuity of the motorcycle is a critical factor in the multiple vehicle accidents, and accident involvement is significantly reduced by the use of motorcycle headlamps (on in daylight) and the wearing of high visibility yellow, orange or bright red jackets. (Note: the statistics which have just been released here in Australia – August 1996, DO NOT SHOW that “Lights on” legislation has worked!)

14. Fuel system leaks and spills were present in 62% of the motorcycle accidents in the post-crash phase. This represents an undue hazard for fire.

15. The median pre-crash speed was 29.8 mph, and the median crash speed was 21.5 mph, and the one-in-a-thousand crash speed is approximately 86 mph.

16. The typical motorcycle pre-crash lines-of-sight to the traffic hazard portray no contribution of the limits of peripheral vision; more than three- fourths of all accident hazards are within 45 degrees of either side of straight ahead.

17. Conspicuity of the motorcycle is most critical for the frontal surfaces of the motorcycle and rider.
18. defects related to accident causation are rare and likely to be due to deficient or defective maintenance.

19. Motorcycle riders between the ages of 16 and 24 are significantly over-represented in accidents; motorcycle riders between the ages of 30 and 50 are significantly under represented. Although the majority of the accident-involved motorcycle riders are male (96%), the female motorcycle riders are significantly over represented in the accident data.

20. Craftsmen, laborers, and students comprise most of the accident-involved motorcycle riders. Professionals, sales workers, and craftsmen are under represented and laborers, students and unemployed are over- represented in the accidents.

21. Motorcycle riders with previous recent traffic citations and accidents are over represented in the accident data.

22. T he motorcycle riders involved in accidents are essentially without training; 92% were self-taught or learned from family or friends. Motorcycle rider training experience reduces accident involvement and is related to reduced injuries in the event of accidents.

23. More than half of the accident-involved motorcycle riders had less than 5 months experience on the accident motorcycle, although the total street riding experience was almost 3 years. Motorcycle riders with dirt bike experience are significantly under represented in the accident data.

24. Lack of attention to the driving task is a common factor for the motorcyclist in an accident.

25. Almost half of the fatal accidents show alcohol involvement.

26. Motorcycle riders in these accidents showed significant collision avoidance problems. Most riders would over brake and skid the rear wheel, and under brake the front wheel greatly reducing collision avoidance deceleration. The ability to counter steer and swerve was essentially absent.

27. The typical motorcycle accident allows the motorcyclist just less than 2 seconds to complete all collision avoidance action.

28. Passenger-carrying motorcycles are not over represented in the accident area.

29. The driver of the other vehicles involved in collision with the motorcycle are not distinguished from other accident populations except that the ages of 20 to 29, and beyond 65 are over represented. Also, these drivers are generally unfamiliar with motorcycles.

30. The large displacement motorcycles are under represented in accidents but they are associated with higher injury severity when involved in accidents.

31. Any effect of motorcycle color on accident involvement is not determinable from these data, but is expected to be insignificant because the frontal surfaces are most often presented to the other vehicle involved in the collision.

32. Motorcycles equipped with fairings and windshields are under represented in accidents, most likely because of the contribution to conspicuity and the association with more experienced and trained riders.

33. Motorcycle riders in these accidents were significantly without motorcycle license, without any license, or with license revoked.

34. Motorcycle modifications such as those associated with the semi-chopper or cafe racer are definitely over represented in accidents.

35. The likelihood of injury is extremely high in these motorcycle accidents-98% of the multiple vehicle collisions and 96% of the single vehicle accidents resulted in some kind of injury to the motorcycle rider; 45% resulted in more than a minor injury.

36. Half of the injuries to the somatic regions were to the ankle-foot, lower leg, knee, and thigh-upper leg.

37. Crash bars are not an effective injury countermeasure; the reduction of injury to the ankle-foot is balanced by increase of injury to the thigh-upper leg, knee, and lower leg. 38.The use of heavy boots, jacket, gloves, etc., is effective in preventing or reducing abrasions and lacerations, which are frequent but rarely severe injuries.

39. Groin injuries were sustained by the motorcyclist in at least 13% of the accidents, which typified by multiple vehicle collision in frontal impact at higher than average speed.

40. Injury severity increases with speed, alcohol involvement and motorcycle size.

41. Seventy-three percent of the accident-involved motorcycle riders used no eye protection, and it is likely that the wind on the unprotected eyes contributed in impairment of vision which delayed hazard detection.

42. Approximately 50% of the motorcycle riders in traffic were using safety helmets but only 40% of the accident-involved motorcycle riders were wearing helmets at the time of the accident.

43. Voluntary safety helmet use by those accident-involved motorcycle riders was lowest for untrained, uneducated, young motorcycle riders on hot days and short trips.

44. The most deadly injuries to the accident victims were injuries to the chest and head.

45. The use of the safety helmet is the single critical factor in the prevention of reduction of head injury; the safety helmet which complies with FMVSS 218 is a significantly effective injury countermeasure.

46. Safety helmet use caused no attenuation of critical traffic sounds, no limitation of pre crash visual field, and no fatigue or loss of attention; no element of accident causation was related to helmet use.

47. FMVSS 218 provides a high level of protection in traffic accidents, and needs modification only to increase coverage at the back of the head and demonstrate impact protection of the front of full facial coverage helmets, and insure all adult sizes for traffic use are covered by the standard.

48. Helmeted riders and passengers showed significantly lower head and neck injury for all types of injury, at all levels of injury severity.

49. The increased coverage of the full facial coverage helmet increases protection, and significantly reduces face injuries.

50. There is not liability for neck injury by wearing a safety helmet; helmeted riders had less neck injuries than unhelmeted riders. Only four minor injuries were attributable to helmet use, and in each case the helmet prevented possible critical or fatal head injury.

51. Sixty percent of the motorcyclists were not wearing safety helmets at the time of the accident. Of this group, 26% said they did not wear helmets because they were uncomfortable and inconvenient, and 53% simply had no expectation of accident involvement.

52. Valid motorcycle exposure data can be obtained only from collection at the traffic site. Motor vehicle or driver license data presents information which is completely unrelated to actual use.

53. Less than 10% of the motorcycle riders involved in these accidents had insurance of any kind to provide medical care or replace property.

Popularity: 1% [?]